As far as I know, if there is a structure built prior to 1978 on a property you are selling, it needs a LBP disclosure.

Better safe than sorry - the fact it is uninhabitable will probably trump the fact that it has lead paint in any buyer's mind so I don't think the possibility of lead paint will discourage any offers. 

I follow what the law and my office require.   

if there's a structure there, it needs a disclosure, even if the buyer says the structure will be knocked down.... he may change his mind!!

I woud include it. 

Built before 1978, disclose! It is the law!

Was it built before 1978? Disclosure is in order.

Disclosing is easy.  Just do it then there is no problem.  Always disclose.

This is a federal law and you need the disclosure. 

I also would say disclose it if it can be rehabbed!

Any improvement on land that has a story has to be told

If one has to ask whether to disclose...the answer almost always is...DISCLOSE!

Randy Hilman, Associate Broker, GRI, CBR To my knowledge, if there is a home on the property built before 1978 a Lead Based Paint disclosure is required.

I don't know what the "right" answer is, but I think a lead disclosure is required for any building. If it could be inhabitable with work and was built prior to 1978, I'd provide.

When is the last time anyone got into trouble for too much disclosure?  I'd say include it.

Randy,

When in doubt disclose, when not in doubt disclose.  A

Nina Hollander has this one.

Lead disclosure is pretty serious, best to be on the safe side.

Disclose.  Can't get into trouble for over disclosing.

It never hurts to disclose everything.

Not required if built after 1978, but it would be a great tool to proctect you and your client should lead is found in the old structure. If the structure was built prior to 1978 Get one executed for your records, It is the Law.

I recently sold a tear down. Included LBP. Listed as Vacant Land and Residential. 

I use them on land sales when there are old barns, outbuildings, etc with lead based paint on them. Even some old fences have lead based paint on them, so use disclosure.

Pre-1978 Structure = Disclosure, cover your rear. I'd rather have too much, than too little paperwork for disputes.

I would think that you would have to disclose, but I may be wrong.

Regardless, in this age of liability why not err on the side of caution.

You bet at least that is something I require.  

Use the disclosure form if there is any structure that can be used as residence. Avoid any chance of law suit.

It may depend on state laws. I would disclose it.

Randy - Excellent job researching your own question and coming up with the answer. I would have said disclose as well, because there is a dwelling on the land, no matter the current condition of the dwelling.

Good morning Randy. I use use one if there is any structure on the property.

If there is a structure...do it. In my state there's a $10,000 fine for not having that in your file. This has recently come up for me. I told the other agent to have her buyer sign the disclosure. What is it going to hurt and I would document with emails that I presented it anyway. So sign the damn thing. 

In the words of Floyd Wickman "I would"

CYA...that is the name in my game

If a building is included, it is not really a land only deal and proper disclosures should be provided.

Randy,
Thanks for posting the official answer.

I would provide one.