As many of you are aware, very often a listing agent together with the seller will increase the commission for the selling agent. The goal, of course, is to increase the chances that an agent will bring someone by to buy the home.
I have never been part of one of these deals - either as the listing agent or the selling agent, but I often wonder what exactly we are asking the selling agent to do? After all, shouldn't the agent be just as motivated to bring a buyer to the house for 3% as he or she would for 5%.
After all, the selling agent cannot make the actual purchase decision for the home. From the buyers' perspective, the home is just as attractive for 5% as it is for 3%. Of course, if the selling agent gives the difference in percentage to the buyer then that may change things, but I suspect that often does not happen.
Are we asking the selling agent to steer the buyer to the home - or in other words persuade the buyer to buy this home over another one? I do know of one case - which occurred where this did happen.
My suspicions are that many of the selling agents that do bring buyers to homes with higher commissions are more full of hope than deceit. They obviously hope that the buyers do choose the home and possibly push them to buy the home.
However, I can see why the result of such commissions is that consumers come to distrust us. After all, if the buyer later finds out that the selling agent received an extra-large commission for finding a buyer for the house, and the buyer didn't know of that before purchasing the house, wouldn't there be lingering after thoughts - "was I steered to this house?", "could I have paid less for it?".
Good question, the only problem with not disclosing is that the unethical agents will pay less commission to the buyers agent. Disclosing the commission is simply so we know how much it is and so that it can not be changed